Online Library
Reandron 1000

Feedback | A-Z Index

Contact Details Site Map Page


Online Library | 2007 Torque

About Us


Quick Ref

Information

Real Lives

Online Library

Publications

Other LInks

Contact Us

I HAVE NOW been on Reandron 1000 about 6 or 8 months and much prefer it to Sustenon or pellets.

I was experiencing a quite high rate of pellet rejection so went on Sustenon for about a year or more, however the Sustenon injections gave me bad hip pain and at times I had great difficulty walking for up to 2-3 days afterwards.

The Reandron is a much larger quantity and because I am very thin hurts me a lot at the time of injection and for about 30 minutes afterwards, however it doesn’t cause me any subsequent pain or problems. I understand other men don’t experience any pain getting the injection.

The absorption rate seems to be very steady, I don’t notice any highs or lows at all. Libido level reasonable, not excessive.

The Reandron product information sheet includes amongst its (many) warnings: • Risk of cervical uterine tumours which can become cancerous.

The pap smear tests carried out on FTM men to date are showing a very high rate of such cancers. I had not previously noticed this warning on any of the androgens.

I strongly urge FTM men to get very regular pap smears or to consider preventative surgery. I do not need to worry about this as I have had a total hysterectomy.

Citation — Col (2007).Reandron 1000. Torque, 7(2), June.

Online Library | Torque 2007 Index

click here to return to the Home page
"Resources for transition and beyond in Australia"

Copyright © FTM Australia (MTRA). all rights reserved | Webmanager - Citing this Website

page revised - 1 July 2007

top